I want a digital camera!

Wednesday, July 26, 2006 Posted by Cecilia Loureiro-Koechlin 12 comments
If anyone out there is willing to give me a gift of motivation... I would like a CANON 350D

Canon EOS350Kit Digital SLR Camera Kit
8 million pixels with CMOS sensor
3 frames per second up to 14 shots
1.8" LCD
Separate RAW/JPEG image recording
Digic II Processor
E-TTL II flash system 7 point auto focus
LEXAR IGB COMPACT FLASH CARD
Lowepro REZO 140 Camera Case

plus a CANON EF90-300MM NON USM Zoom Lens (and a tripod if possible)
Labels: ,

3 years 10 months

Friday, July 21, 2006 Posted by Cecilia Loureiro-Koechlin 5 comments
Hey! I finished my thesis. It's in the bindery now. Will be submitted next tuesday. Yahooooo!!!

Now, it is not as nice as it sounds,
My brain is not working, I am anxious, everyone I know is busy, as I was a few days ago!
I feel like what am I going to do now?
Still need to write my abstract, prepare and wait for my oral exam, and possibly do some changes in the thesis afterwards.

At the moment I am in a Limbo in a state of oblivion. Not a student (my status is as a retainer anyway), unemployed, no money, etc.


naah... just joking, hehehehehehehe... got ya! :p



For those of you who have already gone through this, what is your advice?


-------------------------------------




Einstein did not formulate the theory of relativity in his PhD




Labels:

Another Story

Monday, July 17, 2006 Posted by Cecilia Loureiro-Koechlin 4 comments
Years ago I designed and implemented a windows client/server-based university registration system. The system was a bit complicated as the registration process required the student to do it personally, queue according a priority based on their grades and choose modules and timetables before all the limited places ran out. (It was like a race for places.) The system would also check online whether the student could take a module depending on the student having passed the pre-requisites. There were also millions of other controls which I can't remember now.

We used Centura Builder-former GUPTA- which used a so called object oriented language: SAL (
Scalable Application Language) and IBM's DB2. Although we started using Oracle, someone decided to switch to DB2 instead when we were in the middle of the development! I'm not sure that that was a wise decision as Centura hadn't been been fully tested with DB2. It had inbuilt drivers for Oracle but not for DB2, so we had to use the generic ODBC drivers which didn't have the same performance (well only at the beginning because then the DBA managed to fix the problem). We also used Micro Focus Cobol (which also claimed to have object oriented features) for batch processes. I hated Cobol. Although it wasn't difficult, it was so old-fashioned. The functions that we really used (and really needed) were the basic standard Cobol as it was done in ancient times. Never used object oriented functions. We had to use an editor to type the code and then run a D.O.S. batch to compile the application. Also when we ran the program an awful D.O.S. command window will appear showing nothing! Centura Builder was a bit nicer. It had an attractive IDE, a coding assistant and would compile and run in secs. My problem with Centura though was the fallacy of object orientation. All analysts had taken a OMT course to learn how to design object oriented applications which, they said, could easily be converted into code. OMT would also help us to standardise our designs. Basically we learned to model business rules with UML. After the course I had an idea of what class, object, method, inheritance, message, encapsulation, polymorphism, class and sequence diagrams, etc., were. We would have classes like "student" and "academic record" and methods like "show available modules" and "register". However, when we tried to implement those classes in Centura we couldn't do it in a straight forward way. Centura worked with classes like form, table, list, combobox, etc. all of which were visual classes. There was a way to implement functional classes but it wasn't as friendlier as we would've liked. At the end we had to invent a solution so we could use both OMT and Centura together. We created funtional classes in Centura (containing business rules) which were invoked by visual classes (no business rules here) which in turn where the ones that the users interacted with. This could sound easy, but it wasn't a natural way to work with Centura. After a few months of trying to do this, almost everyone desisted. No one bothered to use UML and code the business rules in functional classes. People did what they thought was more productive: coded as the programming language and time allowed them. The same happened with Micro Focus Cobol. For us it wasn't compatible with UML.

Never again did we use UML to design applications...

hmmm maybe sometimes to show the big boss what we were doing.



Disclaimer: I know I am very outdated in technology possibly antedeluvian. I've been doing a "reading and writing thousands of words in MS Word" job for 4 years! Sometimes I would draw a diagram or two in Visio. I am so outdated I have forgotten how to setup my computer!!

BTW I finished my thesis. I still need to write an abstract and print it out though :/